Do we need more annoying paperclips?

Do we need more annoying paperclips?

If you're like me, you probably remember installing Microsoft Office 97 from a CD-ROM (I know, I'm showing my age now), firing up MS Word only to be met by an odd and extremely irritating paperclip with boggly eyes. It'd say things like "I see you're trying to save your document, would you be interested in...?".

No I wouldn't.

But what if that paperclip was actually far more advanced than any one ever gave it credit for? What if it was so ahead of its time that it would never be truly appreciated?

You see, that paperclip was attempting to provide learning (or at least support) in the flow of work! It was there to provide hints and tips when it looked like you were struggling to achieve something.

Modern workplace learning

Many believe we are currently witnessing the beginnings of a paradigm shift in the way learning happens in the modern workplace. This is of course nonsense. Learning has always happened the same way.

Instead what we are seeing is a reluctant acceptance that the old models of training, and slightly newer models of e-learning, simply aren't fit for purpose. Instead, employees are now independently leveraging platforms and technologies to enable them to overcome the barriers they face and improve their own performance. Where organisation wide innovation is occurring, it takes the form of platforms designed to facilitate in workflow learning and chatbots who can offer help and tutorials to employees at their point of need, much like that old annoying paperclip!

Welcome to the Digital Disruption of L&D

This new approach to workplace learning holds great appeal for all.

For organisations it offers reassurance that learning is relevant and timed to coincide with times of learner need. Guaranteeing that employees have the knowledge and skills they need at their fingertips as and when they need it. It's also incredibly efficient. There's no lag between the learning need arising and the learning intervention. There's also no bloat or filler in the learning materials. Employees learn how to complete their work better, that's it.

For employees this digital disruption at work mirrors and validates their experiences of accessing learning to tackle problems in non-work settings. Outside of work they will happily Google how to do something, or watch someone installing a car seat on YouTube several times until they can do it themselves. That was a fun Sunday afternoon by the way!

More importantly they get the help and learning when they need it. Not in 3 months time when the relevant workshop next runs again. They're not expected to know the theory or history of what they're trying to learn, only the skill itself. And the assessment boils down to one question, "Can you now complete this as part of your day to day work?" Rather than a lengthy and stressful test.

But what about L&D?

This new world order of digital instant learning is set to cause the most disruption to the people who currently design and deliver learning, L&D.

In some ways the new technology offers us a kind of alchemy, the opportunity to transform our practices in to gold. By gold I mean tangible business benefits, the kind of credibility we all crave within an organisation, and the satisfaction of actually providing learning which works from the perspective of organisations and employees alike.

But it comes at a cost. It'll cost us our old outdated mindsets around corporate learning. Our role must change to stay relevant in this new world. No longer the provider of learning, instead the trusted guide and partner along the journey.

Personally I'm all for it, I just hope I don't have to see that bloody paperclip again!

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of DPG Community to add comments!

Join DPG Community

Comments

  • Hi Chris,

    Great post. Thanks so much for this.

    I had a love/hate relationship with that paperclip. At some points it was incredibly useful, sat on my shoulder, watching what I'm doing, then popping up just at the right moment saying 'It looks like you're trying to {insert thing} would you like some help with that?'

    At other points, that interuption was rude and annoying!

    Even so, I had a choice to learn there and then as you say in the moment of need. And I didn't have to sit and listen to some guy waffle on for 14 hours over a two-day workshop that I'd waited three months for just to get the one bit that I needed.

    I think retro tech is something we can learn lots from. It was interesting to see your post this morning, because just last night I came across this video from one of my fave film makers.

    We're all very quick to dismiss the old stuff that works and had legs in favour of the shiny new snake oil. But actually we can learn a lot from this stuff.

    - The paperclip that provided in the moment relevant learning, the basis of a chat bot?

    - Jeeves, the friendly butler that was ready to answer any question that jumped into mind, the basis of managers using Google to develop?

    - MSN twins and instant messenger, the basis of using tools like Slack and Yammer to collaborate as oppose to email?

    - The Tamagotchi, er, {insert some sort or organisational learning reference here} erm, gamification yeah that'll do!

    All of this tells me that there is surely something in building on what we know works and ditching what really doesn't.

    I love your post Chris. I hope there's some more contributions to it.

    Thanks again

    Ady

     

     

     

    • Hi Ady

      Thanks for your reply.  I completely agree that a lot of retro tech which wasn't widely accepted or mainstream at the time paved the way for what has followed.  

      Your examples are brilliant too - I'm getting quite nostalgic now thinking about Tamagotchis!  Its got me thinking about old tech which was based on really good ideas, but the technology wasn't quite there to make it work properly.  Thinks like the old Newton handhelds and Palm Pilots - could they be a precursor to the Tablet?

      Maybe it shows that people don't really change that much - the way we learn, the way we behave, our motivators etc.  So tech designed years ago to meet our needs then could still be relevant now.  And with advances in technology could be improved upon to finally meet its true potential.  Maybe great design is just priceless.

      Here's hoping for some more contributors and more examples of retro tech which could prove valuable again!

      Thanks

      Chris

This reply was deleted.