Being an optimist or a pessimist - are the labels really relevant? 

Being an optimist or a pessimist - are the labels really relevant? 

When talking about optimism, the stereotypical question someone might ask you is:

“Are you a glass half full or a glass half empty kind of person?”

And although some people may be able to categorize themselves as one or the other, most of us would probably answer the question by saying that we are a bit of both.

Optimism and pessimism are not two ends of the same scale

Because although we often think of optimism and pessimism as two ends of the same scale, science is increasingly showing us that this isn’t the case. Instead, it is thought that they are an independent phenomenon. Separate entities which each have their own unique function in the brain.

Traditionally speaking, optimism is seen as the desired mental state, whilst pessimism is frowned upon. But the truth is that both have their own set of advantages and disadvantages. 

Optimism - the pros and cons

Optimism equips you with a positive bias in your thinking which can improve your ability to solve problems, cope more easily with stress and show great perseverance in the face of a challenge. It has also been shown to be generally beneficial for your health and well-being. In fact, there is no hiding from the large body of evidence which shows us how being optimistic is generally a good thing for your quality of life.

But it can also have its downsides. For example, being overly optimistic can blind you to the costs and consequences of a situation. You can overestimate the benefits, and underestimate the costs. And you can make poor decisions because you fail to make an accurate assessment of the number and magnitude of the risks. 

Pessimism - the cons and pros

In contrast, pessimism means that you are prone to seeing problems. What could go wrong? The worse case scenario. This can prevent you from embracing change, avoiding something that you really should be dealing with, or stopping you being able to move forward with a task you are working on.

But is can also help you to manage your confidence, your expectations and your feelings of disappointment. Because if you have low expectations of how something might turn out, then you can feel a boost of confidence when things turn out better than expected. In addition, expecting a less successful outcome can be an effective way to manage the unwanted anxiety associated with having very high expectations of the future. Similarly, if you can envision what might go wrong, then it can motivate you to make sure you are well prepared to cope with the worst eventualities.

A universal bias of unrealistic optimism

One of the interesting things about optimism though, regardless of whether you class yourself as an optimist or a pessimist, is that we all have an in-built bias for optimism. This bias, which has been extensively written about by scientists such as Tali Sharot, influences the way we interpret the world around us, often without our conscious awareness.

But if this bias is affecting us “under the radar” so to speak, how do we start to recognise when it might be influencing, or interfering with our thoughts and decisions to make them less realistic.

Well there are (at least) three main things to be on the lookout for:

Firstly you can have an unrealistic illusion of control. This is where you have an exaggerated belief about your capacity to control external events.

Secondly, you can have an unrealistic illusion of superiority. In this instance, your perception of yourself is more positive than it actually should be - in other words, you think you are more talented than other people.

Thirdly, and often considered to be the most classic form of the optimism bias, is the belief that you are less likely to experience negative events, and more likely to experience positive events than other people around you.

And all these biases have the potential to cause you to make poor decisions and create unrealistic strategy plans at work which are based on a misjudgement of the risks and benefits of the situation, of your abilities, or of how much control you have over the situation.

Don’t force fit me into a category

So next time someone asks you whether you think you are an optimist or a pessimist, tell them that you are both. Or Neither.

Because labelling yourself like this, whilst possibly useful if you are in the business of assigning people to specific categories or “types”, just doesn’t do justice to the complexity of your brain.

Instead, you could see your brain like a hugely complex audio mixing deck, where everyone has broadly the same set of buttons, sliders and dials, but their precise settings and positions vary from person to person. Therefore forcing yourself into a particular fixed category with concrete edges could seem a bit of a fruitless task.

You can find more information at


E-mail me when people leave their comments –

Author of 'Engaged', 'Make Your Brain Work'​ & 'Neuroscience for Coaches', Keynote speaker, Employee Experience shaper. Passionately delivering the message that individuals and organisations have a huge amount of potential that can be better accessed if you understand how to work with your brain optimally.

You need to be a member of DPG Community to add comments!

Join DPG Community


  • Good article and for me it highlights that as humans we have flexibility in how we view a situation; I agree it isn't as simple as 'categorising' the types we are - we can make choices about how we want to behave. We might have a 'go to' mode but we have the ability to challenge and as Carl says, reflect.

    I agree that resilience has a big role to play. I am often inspired by people in life who have faced a setback, picked themselves up, maybe not quite dusted themselves down, but more re-aligned their goals with their new situation and taken a positive away from what has happened. This brings out the optimist in me, which I tend towards (I think!) but I do have a bit of a 'worrier' gremlin who likes to lurk!

    The danger with labels is that they can stick and people become known or identified by that label. I love running and often meet poeple who say they would love to run but they 'aren't sporty'. I can't help but probe (in my quest to help of course!) and often hear that they were told they weren't sporty at school. Well that is a long time to have a label! I won't go on about how I then chip away to encourage them to try...Ady Howes knows all about this! ;-)

    So, as far as labels are concerned, I think we need to treat them with caution and definitely check the 'use by' date! 

  • Thank you for the useful blog. 

    I think labelling and categorising ourselves isnt a useful way to be interpersonal and social. I believe there are benefits for being an optimist and a pessimist but it really does depend on the situation.

    It reminds me a little of Insights, where people are labelled Red Yellow Blue Green, Introvert or Extrovert, Thinker or Feeler. Actually its all based on the situation, you may be direct and red in one situation but reserved and cautious in another. It is a useful framework but only if you consider that we are combination of personalities and cannot fit in to one box...

  • An interesting article. I agree that these two traits are not interdependant and that a more situational approach should be taken with optimism and pessimism. I consider myself quite optimistic about work challenges, but dont get me started on Englands chances in the World Cup :) 

    However, from my own experience, I feel the article is looking at the idea upside down (or is that my own pessimism?)

    From my own experience, I have known people who you would traditionally describe as optimistic. They are far more resilient in dealing with challenges on a regular basis (as discussed previously). However, the example of the "con" about optimism in the article being about underestimating cost and over estimating effect I feel is not the full picture. Since the ultra optamistic person would see these outcomes, learn from their mistakes and develop and make sure they are better next time. Thats the over arching Pro about being optimistic. Having the resilience to learn and grow and be better.

    The pessimistic people certainly have useful traits, such as caution and pragmatism. However, again from the people I have known to be more pessimistic, they are more likely to be the ones who are more destructive, slower to adapt to change and more entrenched in their own thought patterns. This means that often the pessamist will not be able to learn and grow from their mistakes since their over arching attitude is often, "well I knew that wouldnt work." 

    Therefore I feel rather than toning down the traditional optimists, we should be more looking at raising and developing our pessamists more to encourage future personal development (or am I being too optimistic?)

This reply was deleted.

Get Involved

Start a discussion in one of the following Zones


What's Happening?

Mena Livingstone, Lily Page, Emily Lewis-Clarke and 16 more joined DPG Community
33 minutes ago
Mena Livingstone updated their profile
1 hour ago
Jacqueline Alling is now connected with Ruth Brecher, Katie Coupar-Evans and Amy Rose
1 hour ago
Rikita Patel updated their profile
1 hour ago
Farah Bhatti updated their profile photo
4 hours ago
Theresa Mayne FCIPD replied to Martha Luz Asbún's discussion EU settlement scheme
5 hours ago
Lianne Onslow and Tracey Beverley Tucker are now connected
7 hours ago
Tracy Vahter and Suki Gill are now connected
Michael Pryor updated their profile photo
Iliana Paraskevova updated their profile photo
Sabrina Mort updated their profile photo
John Smith updated their profile