The HR Forum

I have been trying to get up to speed with the new General Data Protection Regulations and the potential impact.  A number of particpants have reported they have been on courses recently and that the changes are quite far reaching.

So I was interested to read how this could impact those businesses which use social media to assess applicant's suitability for a role:

An EU data protection working party has ruled that employers should require "legal grounds" before snooping.

The recommendations are non-binding, but will influence forthcoming changes to data protection laws

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-40592516

It would be interesting to hear your thoughts about whether this is acceptable or not?

All the best

Sarah

You need to be a member of DPG Community to add comments!

Join DPG Community

Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • Hi Sarah,

    If I'm honest, I haven't necessarily agreed with it in the first place. Being able to find people on social media, could have a negative impact on their selection when operating a recruitment drive. I don't think that's fare. When I recruit for our business, I don't look on social media to find out about the candidates. However, I am aware that other panel members when it gets to interview stage, do have a look on certain sites, but I would have no problem in future advising them that they are no longer legally allowed to do it. 

    All the best

    Debbie

  • This is really interesting. I know in my organisation members of staff are encouraged to google applicants definitely for academic posts.

    When I was told that this was being done as part of recruitment I didn't think it was fair, because this could lead to judgements being made prior to the candidates performance at interview which could bias the decision making. We certainly didn't tell the applicants such searches were being encouraged, however I when I asked for advice I was told that this was publicly available information and we couldn't do anything to stop it. In fact it was followed up that candidates should expect this when applying for positions as everyone else does it.

    One of the changes we will be looking at in the future as an organisation that may stop this are anonymised applications, but this could be difficult with CVs and academic publications. 

    • That's really interesting Katy thanks for sharing, interesting about this is 'publicly available information' line, which it is but as you say in a world moving towards blind CVs all it would do it reinforce bias prior to the interview.  And I think the fact the employer does not share they are looking with the candidate, one means they know this would probably not go down well and two is not a good way to start the employment relationship from a pscyhological contract perspective.

      All the best

      Sarah

This reply was deleted.

CIPD Branch Events

Did you know your local CIPD branch will put on relevant events that are free to CIPD members.

Take a look for your local branch here and what events are happening. Remember attending these events are great CPD evidence.

CIPD Branch Event Search

What's Happening?

Leanne Day liked Janet Williams's discussion Tribunal Fees to be scrapped
11 minutes ago
Lucy Bolton posted a discussion
23 minutes ago
Sarah Loates replied to Janet Williams's discussion Tribunal Fees to be scrapped
32 minutes ago
Lucy Bolton posted a blog post
3 hours ago
Jason Fox liked Janet Williams's discussion Tribunal Fees to be scrapped
3 hours ago
Janet Williams posted a discussion
3 hours ago
Liam Prendergast and Mike Collins are now connected
23 hours ago
More…